Jan 3, 2023·edited Jan 3, 2023Liked by Robert Against the Machine
A very thought provoking article. I certainly do look at these good doctors and wonder what else they - and the whole profession - is getting wrong.
However, we also have to bare in mind a couple of things: that the degree of brainwashing in medics re drugs and especially vaccines is very high; and that the stakes for stepping out of the closet is therefore also very high. Most medics that are now speaking against the vaccine have had to come to terms with this latter point - quite bravely in my opinion.
I must say that I do not personally know any medics who have not learnt about the vaccine adverse events either through experiences of this or prior vaccines. Even beyond medics, it seems most have learnt to question either through their own or other people's experimentations. Hence, even though I am one of the people who never trusted the vaccine, it was only due to a previous experiences that I was sceptical. I think it is fair to say that there are not many who can claim wisdom through reasoned scepticism alone. After all, there are many drugs that do work, and we cannot read the papers for every drug that comes out on the market.
So having said all that, imo, what one does with the findings once one becomes aware, and what one is willing to sacrifice in order to act on it, is the true test of one's character. One hopes that everyone also learns to become humbler through the experience.
Very insightful and I understand what you are arguing however I think there is a place for correctly recognising people’s standing (as you have done) and still welcoming them anyway.
When we are looking for significant public policy change, keeping our friends and lesser friends closer is important to achieving what should be our paramount goal; the welfare of all individuals within our society. This ultimately requires a unity amongst professionals towards a common goal and may require relaxing some standard to get there.
PS Anthony Fauci was coming in person to the AMA conference in Sydney 2022 but had to cancel at the last moment due to catching Covid-19 ;)
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Seasonality of colds/flu is related to cold dry air and dehydration
Excellent article. I regret I just sent you a lengthy Slack message touching on much of what I've just read in this article, should have read this first! I absolutely agree we should be paying attention to those who, let's say in Apr-May2020, threw up a hand and said "I have many serious questions before we proceed with this". Whether they're credentialed or not, the fact remains they were right and never pushed it. A question I have still is over those that were already there in Mar 2020 that said "something's up" and brought major revelations and compelling charts to the table; but have since gone on to parrot establishment narratives and shy away from any of the glaring & foundational plot holes in modern day reality/clown world. Were they there to be found (like many of the resistance gps) or were they savants somehow to this day still oblivious to many other screamingly obvious inconsistencies in this shared narrative of official reality?
A very thought provoking article. I certainly do look at these good doctors and wonder what else they - and the whole profession - is getting wrong.
However, we also have to bare in mind a couple of things: that the degree of brainwashing in medics re drugs and especially vaccines is very high; and that the stakes for stepping out of the closet is therefore also very high. Most medics that are now speaking against the vaccine have had to come to terms with this latter point - quite bravely in my opinion.
I must say that I do not personally know any medics who have not learnt about the vaccine adverse events either through experiences of this or prior vaccines. Even beyond medics, it seems most have learnt to question either through their own or other people's experimentations. Hence, even though I am one of the people who never trusted the vaccine, it was only due to a previous experiences that I was sceptical. I think it is fair to say that there are not many who can claim wisdom through reasoned scepticism alone. After all, there are many drugs that do work, and we cannot read the papers for every drug that comes out on the market.
So having said all that, imo, what one does with the findings once one becomes aware, and what one is willing to sacrifice in order to act on it, is the true test of one's character. One hopes that everyone also learns to become humbler through the experience.
Very insightful and I understand what you are arguing however I think there is a place for correctly recognising people’s standing (as you have done) and still welcoming them anyway.
When we are looking for significant public policy change, keeping our friends and lesser friends closer is important to achieving what should be our paramount goal; the welfare of all individuals within our society. This ultimately requires a unity amongst professionals towards a common goal and may require relaxing some standard to get there.
PS Anthony Fauci was coming in person to the AMA conference in Sydney 2022 but had to cancel at the last moment due to catching Covid-19 ;)
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Seasonality of colds/flu is related to cold dry air and dehydration
Dehydration is the point of susceptibility
Find the article
Jane333.Substack.com
Excellent article. I regret I just sent you a lengthy Slack message touching on much of what I've just read in this article, should have read this first! I absolutely agree we should be paying attention to those who, let's say in Apr-May2020, threw up a hand and said "I have many serious questions before we proceed with this". Whether they're credentialed or not, the fact remains they were right and never pushed it. A question I have still is over those that were already there in Mar 2020 that said "something's up" and brought major revelations and compelling charts to the table; but have since gone on to parrot establishment narratives and shy away from any of the glaring & foundational plot holes in modern day reality/clown world. Were they there to be found (like many of the resistance gps) or were they savants somehow to this day still oblivious to many other screamingly obvious inconsistencies in this shared narrative of official reality?